For a long time, the claim has been made that the brains of conservative people are different than those of progressives. Using MRI scans of almost 1,000 Dutch people, researchers from the University of Amsterdam (UvA) show that there is indeed a connection between brain structure and ideology. However, the connection is smaller than expected. Nevertheless, the researchers find it remarkable that differences in the brain are linked to something as abstract as ideology.

The claim that brain structure and ideology are linked was fueled by a 2011 study of 90 English students that found this connection. Scientists at the UvA have now conducted the largest replication study to date to further investigate the relationship between ideology and brain structure.

The researchers analyzed the MRI scans of 975 Dutch people aged 19 to 26, representing a cross-section of the Dutch population in terms of education and political preference. They linked these scans to questionnaires about ideology. 'You can see ideology as a series of positions on different themes or as an identity,' explains first author Gijs Schumacher. 'You can also distinguish between ideological ideas about socio-cultural issues such as women's and LGBTIQ rights, and about economic issues such as income inequality.'

The amygdala is slightly larger

The scientists found, just as in the English study, that the amygdala of conservative people is slightly larger. ‘It is remarkable that we also found this result in our much larger and more representative sample. For example, the English sample did not contain any extremely conservative participants, while ours did,’ says Schumacher.

The scientists also found that there is no relationship between another brain area - the anterior cingulate cortex - and ideology, something that the original study did find.

Difference of a sesame seed

The difference in the amygdala was the size of a sesame seed. ‘The amygdala of the average conservative voter is 157 sesame seeds in size and that of the average progressive voter is 156 sesame seeds. That is a small difference, but significant. It suggests that there is a connection between brain anatomy and ideology at some level, but that it is very indirect,’ explains co-author Steven Scholte. ‘Our expectation was therefore to find no effect at all.’

‘However, we do not know exactly how conservatism and the size of the amygdala are related,’ adds Diamantis Petropoulos Petalas (also associated with this study but now working at The American College of Greece). ‘The amygdala has mainly been studied in relation to threatening situations and fear, but seems to respond much more broadly to emotions in general and to divergent information. There may be a connection where the amygdala is larger in individuals who react more strongly to information, which could sometimes result in more conservative ideas in politics.'

No simple dichotomy

However, the research suggests there is no simple dichotomy regarding political ideology in the brain. ‘People sometimes speak of blue (Democratic) and red (Republican) brains in the American context. This metaphor is tempting, but completely misplaced,’ says Schumacher. ‘We argue that ideology should be seen as a much broader concept and show that there are fewer connections between brain and ideology than have been found in previous studies.’

Ideology itself is also more complex than was assumed in previous research. As an example, Schumacher mentions how participants who voted for the SP, a Dutch political party with radical left-wing economic positions but more conservative social values, had a larger amygdala on average than participants who identified with more progressive parties. ‘Ideology is therefore much more complex than just identification on socio-cultural themes.’

Other brain areas

The researchers then extended their analysis to find connections between ideology and other brain areas. For example, they found a connection between the volume of the right fusiform gyrus, an area of ​​the brain important for facial recognition, and more right-wing positions on social and economic issues. The reason for this remains to be seen.