The return of protectionism: The impact of the Sino-US trade war
en-GBde-DEes-ESfr-FR

The return of protectionism: The impact of the Sino-US trade war

15.11.2024 TranSpread

Since 2018, Sino-US economic and trade relations have become increasingly tense. Between 2018 and 2019, the US imposed seven rounds of tariffs on China, to which China responded with retaliatory measures. The simple average tariff rates on US imports from China rose from 4.07% in January 2018 to 24.43% in December 2019, while the simple average tariff rates on Chinese imports from the US increased from 9.32% in January 2018 to 22.53% in December 2019 (see figure 1).

Consequently, the share of Chinese goods in US imports declined significantly — from a peak of 21.6% in 2017 to 14% in 2023. As the world's two largest economies, the trade conflict between the US and China is expected to have far-reaching implications not only for their trade and welfare, but also for the global economy.

In a recent review article (doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceqi.2024.09.003) published in the KeAi journal China Economic Quarterly International, two researchers in China reported an overview of the Sino-US trade war, analyzing its background, evolution and effects on the global economy.

“Existing literature indicates that the Sino-US trade war has resulted in significant welfare losses for both countries, with surprisingly little impact on employment,” says co-author Hong Ma from Tsinghua University. “Specifically, the additional tariffs imposed by the US on China have neither effectively addressed trade imbalances nor brought manufacturing jobs back onshore.”

The study also examined the reshaping of global supply chains resulting from the Sino-US trade conflict. “The ongoing trade tensions between China and the US have revealed vulnerabilities in the global supply chain and intensified the trend toward regionalized production networks,” shares co-author Jingxin Ning from University of International Business and Economics. “Interestingly, although China's share in US imports has fallen dramatically since the outbreak of the Sino-US trade war, in terms of value-added imports, the US' dependence on China's products has actually increased.”

The authors highlight that unilateral trade policies have limited effectiveness in addressing the complex economic and social challenges brought by globalization, and suggest future research focus on the interdisciplinary impacts of trade policies and developing a balanced strategy that promotes economic growth, distributive justice and political stability.

###

References

DOI

10.1016/j.ceqi.2024.09.003

Original Source URL

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceqi.2024.09.003

Funding information

Hong Ma thanks the financial support of the Social Science Foundation of China (Grant No.23&ZD046) and Tsinghua University Scientific Research Program (Grant No.2023TSG08102). Jingxin Ning thanks financial support from the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities in UIBE (Grant No.23QD10).

About China Economic Quarterly International

China Economic Quarterly International (CEQI) seeks to promote the understanding of how the experience of China's economic development and institutional change can contribute to economic theory. The journal welcomes papers studying the process and consequences of China's economic reforms, the social and economic impact of important domestic and international policies, the economic linkage between China and other countries, and the comparison between the development process of China and that in the rest of the world. Issue-driven papers that develop insightful ideas from the real world and have general implications are particularly encouraged.

Paper title: The return of protectionism: Prospects for Sino-US trade relations in the wake of the trade war
Angehängte Dokumente
  • Changes in U.S. tariff increases and China’s retaliatory tariffs
15.11.2024 TranSpread
Regions: North America, United States, Asia, China
Keywords: Society, Economics/Management

Disclaimer: AlphaGalileo is not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to AlphaGalileo by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the AlphaGalileo system.

Referenzen

We have used AlphaGalileo since its foundation but frankly we need it more than ever now to ensure our research news is heard across Europe, Asia and North America. As one of the UK’s leading research universities we want to continue to work with other outstanding researchers in Europe. AlphaGalileo helps us to continue to bring our research story to them and the rest of the world.
Peter Dunn, Director of Press and Media Relations at the University of Warwick
AlphaGalileo has helped us more than double our reach at SciDev.Net. The service has enabled our journalists around the world to reach the mainstream media with articles about the impact of science on people in low- and middle-income countries, leading to big increases in the number of SciDev.Net articles that have been republished.
Ben Deighton, SciDevNet
AlphaGalileo is a great source of global research news. I use it regularly.
Robert Lee Hotz, LA Times

Wir arbeiten eng zusammen mit...


  • BBC
  • The Times
  • National Geographic
  • The University of Edinburgh
  • University of Cambridge
  • iesResearch
Copyright 2024 by DNN Corp Terms Of Use Privacy Statement