The habit of driving influences even environmentally conscious individuals to view carbon taxation more negatively.
This is suggested by a new study, the first of its kind to investigate how habitual behaviors affect attitudes toward carbon taxes.
Attempts to introduce or increase carbon taxes are notoriously met with political resistance, which may explain why such taxes often fall well below scientifically recommended levels. Sometimes, opposition to taxes targeting car use is strong even among those with close political ties to the environmental movement. According to a new study, this may be because the habit of driving is nearly as influential on attitudes toward carbon taxation as environmental engagement and political affiliation.
“Previous research has primarily examined how attitudes influence habits. Here, we’ve turned the question around. The most surprising finding is that the habit of using a car impacts attitudes toward carbon taxes almost as much as political views and environmental concerns,” says Noah Linder, postdoctoral researcher at the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.
A Unique study on habits
The study is the first to explore how driving habits affect attitudes toward higher carbon taxes. The findings are based on a survey of 5,280 respondents, drawn from a representative sample of Sweden’s population.
“What surprised us next was that the total distance driven matters less than expected. It is the strength of the habit, rather than the extent of driving, that influences views on carbon taxes—even though those driving the longest distances are more significantly impacted financially by such taxes,” explains Stephan Barthel, Professor of Environmental Science at the University of Gävle.
Based on the results, the researchers emphasize the importance of considering habitual behaviors when designing climate policies. Public acceptance of climate measures can be improved by creating opportunities to break entrenched behaviors, such as enhancing public transport access, making cycling more attractive, or offering financial incentives for alternative modes of transport.
"The correlation is strong"
Stephan Barthel underscores the need for further studies to draw firmer conclusions about the role of habits in attitudes toward carbon taxes and other environmental policy tools.
“This is the first study to explore the correlation between car habits and policy acceptance, and that’s important to highlight. The correlation exists and is strong, but we need more knowledge to establish a definitive causal relationship.”